Monthly Archives: June 2011

Oak Barrels vs. Oak Chips: The Showdown

http://www.precisionmonitoring.com/images/BarrelCellar.jpg

One major cost associated with producing wine is the cost of the barrel in which it is fermented and/or aged.  A brand new American oak barrel in 2011 costs roughly $400, while a brand new French oak barrel in 2011 costs roughly $900 (though some can be more expensive, depending upon toasting and other customized options).  One way wineries are cutting costs when it comes to barrel choice, is using toasted oak chips in wine that is fermenting/aging in stainless steel tanks, which costs hundreds less than the oak barrel option. 

It is said that this combination of steel tanks and oak chips produces the same result at the end of the winemaking process.  What you basically get is a wine that consumers will believe has been fermenting and aging in oak barrels.  If the goal is produce a lower price point wine that still retains quality oak barrel fermented characteristics, then the use of oak chips in a stainless steel tank may be very intriguing.

Oak Chips:  En Vogue? Or Taboo?

http://www.beercollege.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/20070320_asimov.jpg

Up until 1993, in the United States, the use of oak chips in wine was illegal (even though some winemakers were still using them).  The use of oak chips is also not highly advertised by winemakers or wineries, because they carry with it the stigma that the wine is of poorer quality.  What consumers feel about the use of oak chips in wine is relatively unknown.  It is known that customers generally appreciate their wines aged in oak barrels.  It is also known that consumers generally choose their wines based on the type of wine, price point, the quality certification, the grape variety, and the brand.  In order to stay in the game, in these times of seemingly low attention spans, wineries are always trying to “go with the flow” by introducing new products, in order to retain the attention of current customers and/or to gain new customers.

Fermenting and aging a wine in oak barrels gives certain sensory characteristics that are pleasing to many consumers.  Basically, during the aging process in an oak barrel, many compounds are extracted from the wood that adds overall complexity to the wine.  Small amounts of oxygen are also entering the wine through the pores in the wood, which react with the phenolic components of the wine to increase stability and also aroma and mouthfeel complexity.  This process is often slow, thus delaying the release of the wine to the customers.  If a winery is interested in producing wines with complex oak character but would like a faster way to get it out to the public, then an alternative such as adding wood chips in a stainless steel tank may be the solution.

The use of oak chips first started in the production of spirits when they would use wood fragments instead of barrels for aging.  Once the wood chips are added to the spirits or wine, the oak-phenols and other volatile compounds that give “oaky” complexity to the wine is absorbed in the same manner it was when in the oak barrel.  The only difference, however, is that no oxygen enters the wine in the same way it did when in oak barrels.  In the early 1990s, the solution to this problem was solved with the development of the micro-oxygenation technique, which allows minute quantities of oxygen to enter the wine in the stainless steel tanks, so as to mimic the same process that occurs in the traditional oak barrels.  When it’s all said and done, this entire process costs much less and goes to completion much faster than the traditional oak barrel aging technique.

As of 2005, the use of oak chips in wine was approved in the European Union.  Surprising, since the traditional methods of winemaking are very strictly regulated, however, the use of the oak chips were approved provided that the production method be clearly labeled on the bottle of wine so that the consumer knows exactly how that wine was made and can thereby make an informed decision on whether or not to purchase.  Studies have shown that label information on a bottle of wine is very influential on the potential customer, but little is known about consumer preferences when it comes to oak barrel versus oak chip wine.

Purpose of the study reviewed today

So far, many studies have looked at chemical differences between wines aged in oak barrels versus wines fermented and aged using oak chips.  However, no studies have looked at consumer preferences based on taste tests of the two wine types, even though in theory, that is the ultimate goal.  In order to determine whether or not the use of oak chips is financially beneficial for a winery, be it in reduced costs and/or increased or decreased sales, consumer preferences must be determined. 

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_FbidVSnCp9U/S42GgyS6mPI/AAAAAAAABpY/MJKPPCyXMAc/s320/Wine_preference.gif

The main goal of today’s study was to determine consumers’ opinions of the use of oak chips in red wine, their acceptance of them, and their intentions of purchasing them.

Methods

First, a questionnaire was giving to all participants (150 individuals from the Castilla y León Autonomous Community in northern Spain) in order to determine their wine type preference and their wine consumption habits.  Other questions were asked to determine the importance of factors during the purchasing process, and sensory attributes when consuming wine.  Questions were also asked to determine what the importance of back label information on the wine bottle was for consumers, whether or not they accepted the use of oak chips in wine, and whether or not they intend to buy wines that had been made using oak chips.

Wine Samples

The wine variety used for this study was Tinta del País, which is one of the most commonly consumed reds in the region, and thus the study participants would be very familiar with it.  For the traditional oak barrel samples, the wine was split up into three American and three French oak barrels after malolactic fermentation.  Wines were barrel aged for 6 months, then bottled and left for one month before the study began.  The rest of the wine was stored in stainless steel tanks at 15oC for 5 months, in order to minimize the difference in bottling time, due to the aging process in the traditional barrels.  After 5 months, the wine was split up into four steel tanks, and two different types of oak chips (American and French) were added to two barrel each.  All barrels and oak chips were a medium-plus toast.  Maceration (contact of wine with oak chips) and micro-oxygenation was performed for one month.  After completion, the oak chips were removed and the wine bottled and stored for one month before the study began.

Sensory Analysis

http://blog.snooth.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/_mg_8994.jpg

For the sensory (or taste) analysis, 65 frequent red wine drinkers were chosen for the study.  All of the participants consumed red wine at least 2-3 times per week.  All wines (barrel aged and oak chip) were presented to each participant blindly and in random order.  Participants ranked each wine in order of their personal preference, without knowing exactly which wine was in which glass.

Results of the Questionnaire

  •       The participants in the study were 55% male and 45% female, between the ages of 20 and 65.
  •       The total participant pool preferred red wine (76.7%), especially red wine aged in oak barrels (88.0%).
  •       88% of participants would not pay more the 20Euros (~$29) for “crianza” wine (aged for 2 years in a barrel).
  •       66% of participants claimed to consume 1-2 glasses when they drink wine.
  •       There were no differences between men and women in regards to wine preferences and wine consumption habits.
  •       Older participants preferred red wine and wines in oak barrels significantly more than younger participants.
  •       Older participants preferred wines aged longer in barrels significantly more than younger participants, who preferred younger wines not aged as long.
  •        There were no significant differences between the two age groups in regards to how much they were willing to pay for wines (so economics is not a factor for younger consumers).
  •       Younger participants preferred wine as a pre-meal drink, whereas older participants preferred the wine to go with lunch or dinner.
  •       Younger participants preferred to drink only on weekends or occasionally, while older participants were more consistent consuming wine throughout the week.
  •       The least important factors when considering purchasing a wine for any age group is grape variety, back label information, and brand.  The more important factors were:  recommendation of a wine, price point, type of wine, and quality certification.
  •       The most important qualities either age group looks for when tasting the wine are: balance and roundness in the mouthfeel, and woody and fruity aromas.
  •        87.3% of the participants read the back label information on wine, and 93.3% of them said it was important (since usually this is where taste/smell characteristics are indicated).

So…get to the oak chips, already….

  •        64% of the participants said knowledge of the winemaking process may change their mind about buying a particular wine. (Significantly more older participants than younger).
  •        55% of participants said they would NOT buy wines that said they were made with oak chips.

o   They would only consider purchasing the oak chip wines if they had a chance to taste it and discovered it was still a pleasant wine.

  •       Significantly more younger participants would be willing to purchase a wine made with oak chips than older participants (indicating more traditionalist views and unwillingness to change in the older age group).

Results of the Sensory Analysis

·         Based on the sensory analysis described above, there were NO significant differences in taste preferences of any of the four wines tested (American and French oak barrels, or American and French oak chips).  The American oak barrel wine scored the lowest, however, this difference was not statistically significant (see Figure 1, extracted from the study we are reviewing today).


Figure 1. Global scores (sum of rankings) of each wine sample given by

65 frequent consumers: Am-Barrel and Fr-Barrel, wines aged in American

and French medium-plus toasted new barrels respectively; Am-Chips and

Fr-Chips, wines treated with American and French medium-plus toasted

degree chips respectively.

What does this all mean?

Based on the results of the sensory analysis, it is clear that there are no differences in taste preference between wines barrel aged and wines that were made using oak chips.  This does not take into account any potential chemical differences between the two, but that should not matter, considering the ultimate goal of the study was to determine, flat out, whether or not people rejected wines that were made using oak chips instead of the more traditional oak barrels.

There also didn’t appear to be any differences in preference between American and French oak barrels, which is to be expected, since what one person loves another person may hate, thereby negating any potential differences between the two.

Results of the questionnaire indicated that consumers may be more hesitant about choosing wines made with oak chips, and is likely a result of hesitance to change or dedication to a more traditional approach to winemaking.  The results of the sensory analysis indicate that consumers do not overwhelmingly reject wines made with oak chips, and that they did not prefer oak barrels over oak chips based on pure taste alone.

These results indicate to me that producing wine using oak chips is a legitimate way for wineries to cut costs, while still producing quality wines for their customers.  Since there could potentially be decreased sales due to what we learned in the questionnaire given in this study, and consumers hesitation about purchasing wine made with oak chips, tastings should be offered to customers to show that the quality has not been altered.

http://images.clipartof.com/small/55928-Royalty-Free-RF-Clipart-Illustration-Of-A-3d-Wine-Bottle-Character-With-A-Pink-Label-Giving-The-Thumbs-Up.jpg

For me, I had the same hesitation in the beginning regarding wine made with oak chips, but after seeing the results of the study, I am less inclined to flat out reject a wine that has been made in this “modern” approach.  For my everyday table wine, I’m happy to purchase a wine made with oak chips, but for more special occasions, I may (or may not!) be inclined to purchase a more traditional bottle of wine.  Perhaps I need to taste one for myself to see!

What do you all think about this topic?  I’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to comment below!

Full citation of the study discussed today:

Pérez-Magariño, S., Ortega-Heras, M., and González-Sanjosé, M.L. 2011. Wine consumption habits and consumer preferences between wines aged in barrels or with chips. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91: 943-949.

I am not a health professional, nor do I pretend to be. Please consult your doctor before altering your alcohol consumption habits. Do not consume alcohol if you are under the age of 21. Do not drink and drive. Enjoy responsibly!

Wine Law 101: Silly Alcohol Laws Edition

Every state has its own laws regarding the sale and consumption of wine and other alcohol.  Some may be legit, but others are just plain silly!  Today’s post is a light-hearted break from the heavier scientific reviews, and highlights just a few of the many laws related to wine or alcohol in the United States.  Since laws change all the time, it’s possible some of these are no longer in effect.  I also can’t confirm the accuracy of some of the sillier ones, but I really wouldn’t put it past state governments to enforce them.  ;)  

This is all in good fun, so enjoy!

Alabama:  Just below 40% of the counties in Alabama are “dry”, as in they don’t allow the sale of alcohol.  However, within those dry counties, it is not illegal to possess or consume alcohol.

Alaska:  In Fairbanks, Alaska, it is apparently illegal to feed alcohol to a moose. 

Arizona:  Once identified as being intoxicated at a bar or other establishment, a individual is only allowed to remain for 30 minutes.  This gives a “sober person to arrive at the premises and drive the intoxicated person home”.

Arkansas:  Depending upon what sort of alcohol license an establishment has, the hours alcohol is allowed to be served differs.  A ‘Class A Private Club’ license allows alcohol to be sold from7am to 2am; ‘Class B Private Club’ licenses allow alcohol to be sold from 10am to 5am; and ‘Restaurant’ licenses allow alcohol to be sold from 7am to 1am.

http://www.packagingdigest.com/photo/149/149038-little_red_riding_hood_v2.jpg

California:  It is illegal to sell alcohol beverages within 5 feet of a cash register in a store that sells both alcohol and motor fuel.  Also, in 1990, Empire, CA banned a traditional version of the famous book “Little Red Riding Hood” because there was a bottle of wine in the basket Little Red Riding Hood was taking to her sick grandmother, and the local school board thought it would encourage underage drinking.

Colorado:  It is illegal to ride a horse under the influence.

Connecticut:  You still can’t buy alcohol in CT on Sundays, which makes them the last state in the Northeast to retain the old rule.

Delaware:  Passengers in a vehicle may consume alcohol, though the driver may not drink and drive.

Florida:  “40’s” are illegal in Florida.  Alcohol must be packaged in either containers of 32oz or less, or 1 gallon or more.

http://pondplants.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/gold_fish.jpg

Georgia:  This has nothing to do with wine or alcohol, but was so ridiculous that I can’t help but post it (I pray it’s true!!!);   Goldfish may not be given away to entice someone to enter into a game of BINGO. 

Hawaii: Another one not related to wine or alcohol, but I suppose risk of it occurring is increased when inebriated; in Honolulu public parks, it is illegal to annoy any bird.

Idaho:  Possession of an unregistered, unlabelled keg is punishable by a $1,000 fine or 6 months in prison.

Illinois: In Chicago, it is illegal to give a dog whiskey.  In Pullman, it is illegal to drink beer out of a bucket while sitting on the curb.

Indiana:  It is illegal for liquor stores to sell milk and cold soft drinks.  However, they are allowed to sell soft drinks at room temperature.

Iowa: It is illegal to start a tab at a bar in Iowa.

Kansas:  I don’t know if this is really a law, or just something a crazy Attorney General dreamed up, but it’s too ridiculous not to post:  One Kansas AG claimed that drinking in an airliner above was forbidden by state law while the plane was over “dry” Kansas airspace, since he claimed that “Kansas goes all the way up and all the way down”.  Oh my….

http://multifamilyinvestor.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Buster-Keaton-jail.jpg

Kentucky:  It is illegal to ship alcohol to Kentucky, even if it’s just a bottle of wine for your mother, unless you want to be charged with a felony and go to jail for the next five years (sorry, Mom and Dad, no VA wine for you!).

Louisiana:  Underage possession of alcohol is illegal, except for when you are in a private residence and are accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, for religious, medical, or educational purposes.

Maine: You may not possess an unregistered or unlabelled keg, lest you want to incur a hefty fine and/or 6 months in prison.

Maryland: Alcohol beverage writers must be certified as experts by a state agency in order to be eligible to receive product samples and can only receive three bottles per brand.

http://blog.winemag.com/editors/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/TurkeyCartoon.jpg

Massachusetts:  It is illegal to give beer to hospital patients.  Also, the Pilgrims decided to stop off at Plymouth Rock instead of continuing on to their originally desired destination, partially because they were running dangerously low on booze.

Michigan: Persons may not be drunk on trains.  Also, it is illegal for an underage individual to give an alcoholic beverage to anyone, even if that person is of legal drinking age.

Minnesota:  It is NOT a crime to be drunk in public.

Mississippi: A parent, guardian, or legal spouse may give beer and/or wine to persons 18 and older.

Missouri:  If you are underage and are taking out the trash that contains an empty alcohol container, you may be charged with illegal possession of alcohol (good excuse not to have to take out the trash in Missouri if you’re a kid!).

Montana: A parent or guardian may provide alcohol (in non-intoxicating amounts) to a minor for religious, medical, or educational purposes.

http://www.epicurious.com/images/recipes/recipe_results/full/photos/231641.jpg

Nebraska:  Bars may not sell beer unless they are simultaneously making a kettle of soup.

Nevada: In Nyala, NV, one is forbidden from buying drinks for more than three people (other than himself) in a day. 

New Hampshire:  It is illegal to be served alcohol unless you are sitting down.  Also, in Claremont, NH, in cemeteries, it is illegal to get drunk, picnic, enter at night, and enter by one’s self if that person is younger than 10 (but if you’re 12 that’s OK??).

New Jersey:  If you are convicted of a DUI, you are not legally able to get personalized license plates for three years.

New Mexico:  Selling, serving, or giving alcohol to a minor is a Class 4 felony and punishable by up to 18 months in prison.  Eek!

New York:  All liquor stores must be owned by a single owner, who lives within a certain distance of it (which effectively bans chain liquor stores).

North Carolina: State liquor stores are not allowed to advertise.  Also, ABC stores are not allowed to sell anything over 151 proof, all because of one town that cited concerns after one ABC store was selling a lot of 191 proof liquor near college campuses.

North Dakota:  Beer and pretzels may not be served at the same time in any bar or restaurant.

http://www.austinfunblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/fish_-_drunk.gif

Ohio:  It is illegal to get a fish drunk.  Also, the wine brand “Fat Bastard” is banned for sale within OH borders, to “protect impressionable children”.

Oklahoma:  I can’t resist posting this one:  It is illegal for the owner of a bar to allow anyone inside to pretend to have sex with a buffalo.  Dammit!

Oregon: A parent or guardian may provide alcohol to a minor for religious, medical, or educational purposes.

Pennsylvania:  The law states that a man may not buy alcohol without written permission from his wife. 

Rhode Island: The state of Rhode Island never ratified the 18th Amendment which established Prohibition (Rhode Island must have been one happenin’ place back then!).

South Carolina: It is illegal to sell alcohol on Sundays, unless you are a Private Club.

South Dakota: A parent or guardian may provide alcohol to a minor for religious, medical, or educational purposes.

Tennessee: It is illegal to dare a child to purchase beer.

Texas:  No one is permitted to consume more than three sips of beer at a time while standing.

http://img.slate.com/media/68/021001_WineSpitting_Spot.jpg

Utah:  Wine used in wine tastings must not be swallowed.

Vermont:  VT was considering lowering the drinking age to 18 (since many drive to Canada to get drunk and get in terrible accidents on the drive back), but the federal government would deny them millions of dollars in funding if they passed such a law.

Virginia:  In Virginia Beach, if you’re pulled over and get a DUI, the passenger inside the vehicle may also receive a DUI if they are intoxicated as well.

Washington:  In Lynden, WA, drinking and dancing may not occur in the same establishment.

West Virginia: Bars may advertise liquor prices, but not liquor brands.

Wisconsin:  An underage individual who is married to someone 21 years or older may consume alcoholic beverages with them legally.

Wyoming:  If you are drunk in a mine, you face up to one year in prison.  Also, it is illegal for a woman to stand within 5 feet of a bar while drinking.  Finally, skiing while intoxicated is illegal.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ADR16grZvZA/TTXYsgnHiJI/AAAAAAAAAPU/hS4uaO7Nz-w/s320/drunk-skiing.jpg

I hope you all enjoyed this little bit of silliness!  If you know of other ridiculous laws related to wine or alcohol in your home state, feel free to comment below!


I am not a health professional, nor do I pretend to be. Please consult your doctor before altering your alcohol consumption habits. Do not consume alcohol if you are under the age of 21. Do not drink and drive. Enjoy responsibly!

Wine Does a Body Good? Effects of Alcohol Consumption on Bone Mineral Density in Adults

So far in this blog, I’ve presented current research showing positive associations between moderate wine consumption and better cognitive function/memory, as well as cardiovascular protective effects.  I’ve also presented some negative associations between alcohol/wine consumption and In Vitro Fertilization success.

http://www.osteopathy.com.sg/images/bone-loss.jpg

In today’s post, I’ll present results from a study performed in 2009 (which was the first of its’ kind) looking at the effect of alcohol consumption on bone mineral density (BMD) in older men and women.  The results of this study could have implications for osteoporosis risk and whether specific types of alcohol result in increased or decreased BMD.

Introduction

To date, studies have shown that there is a positive association between alcohol consumption and bone mineral density (BMD) in older women.  However, little work has been done focusing on men, or younger women.  In the few studies that have been done, it has been found that for men aged 65 years and older, there was a linear relationship between alcohol consumption and BMD at the hip and spine, and that greater alcohol consumption was not related to fracture risk.  Another study found that for both men and women aged 20 years and older, BMD at the hip and femoral neck was much higher in men consuming greater than 5 drinks per month (compared to non-drinkers).  The same study found that for post-menopausal women consuming greater than 29 drinks per month (nearly one per day) had a higher femoral neck BMD that non-drinkers.

Somewhat contrary to these results, other studies have shown a more U-shaped relationship between alcohol consumption and risk of a hip fracture in adults over 65 years old.  The study found positive effects with alcohol consumption of up to 2 drinks per day, but negative effects (or increased risk of fractures) with consumption greater than 2 drinks per day.  The authors of these studies suggested that there could be differences between alcohol types, and also between age and sex.

At the time of publication, no other study had examined whether are different effects between specific types of alcohol (beer, wine, or liquor) and bone mineral density are present, or if all alcohol behaves in similar ways regarding BMD.  Wine has been shown to have several important health benefits, when consumed in moderation, and beer has been shown to be a significant source of silicon (which also has health benefits), which could contribute to their effectiveness on increasing BMD in older adults.  The current study under review examines the association between total alcohol consumption and individual types of alcoholic beverages on bone mineral density in older men, postmenopausal women, and premenopausal women.

Methods

The individuals in the study were participants in the Framingham Osteoporosis Study, and returned every 4 years for a physical exam and to complete several questionnaires and tests.  In the subsequent 5th and 6th visits, bone mineral density was measured for all participants.  There were a total of 2,919 individual participants, 1280 of them men, and 1639 of them women, all between the ages of 29-86 years old.

Alcohol consumption was measured as an average between the two questionnaires given in the 5th and 6th visits.  Bone mineral density was measured via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the right hip (broken down into total hip, trochanter, and femoral neck), and at the lumbar spine.  Dietary history was measured via questionnaires (as with alcohol consumption).  Individuals were identified as either being “former drinkers” or “never drinkers”, to help tease out any effect past drinking may have on bone mineral density.

Confounding factors taken into consideration during this study were: menopausal status, physical activity level, smoking status, medication use, estrogen use, use of osteoporosis medication, and total intake of energy (dietary calcium, dietary vitamin D, magnesium, potassium, and vitamin K).

For more detailed methods, please reference the article cited at the end of this post, or leave a comment with specific questions.

Results

The average age of men in this study was 61 years old; postmenopausal women had an average age of 62 years old, and premenopausal women had an average age of 48 years old.  The average BMI (body mass index) for all of the groups was in the overweight range (27-29).  11-13% of the participants were smokers.  Almost no men or premenopausal women were taking osteoporosis medication, though 4.1% of postmenopausal women were taking that type of medication. 

The majority of the individuals in the study, according to their questionnaires, were moderate drinkers, with none-1 drink consumed per day (44% men, 56% postmenopausal women, 62% premenopausal women).  21% of men, 7% of postmenopausal women, and 7% of premenopausal women were heavy consumers, drinking more than 2 drinks per day.  Men consumed primarily beer, while women consumed primarily wine.  For wine drinkers, most consumed both red and white wine.  For men, this break down was about 50/50 for red and white, whereas for women, 75% of the wine consumed was white, while 25% of the wine consumed was red.

The study found a lot of significant relationships between bone mass density and alcohol consumption, of which I will present to you in bullet format, for easier reading.

·         In men:  Nondrinkers and those drinkers consuming up to ½ a drink per day had significantly lower bone mass density than those drinking 1-2 drinks per day.

·         Men consuming more than 2 drinks (beer or liquor, specifically) per day show significantly lower bone mass density compared to the moderate 1-2 drinks per day group.

·         These trends for men tended to appear much strong for postmenopausal women.

o   For postmenopausal women, those consuming 2 or more drinks per day showed significantly higher bone mineral density than nondrinkers.

o   Wine consumption showed significantly higher bone mineral density in all bone sites measured compared to nondrinkers.

o   Beer consumption showed significantly higher bone mineral density only at the femoral neck site.

o   Liquor consumption showed significantly higher bone mineral density only at the lumbar spine site.

·         There was no association between alcohol consumption and bone mineral density of premenopausal women, though there was low power with this test, and no solid conclusion can thereby be made.

·         For men:  the highest bone mineral density was seen in those consuming 1-2 drinks per day, with lower bone mineral density occurring when consumption was higher.

o   Bone mineral density was between 2.5-5.3% greater in men consuming 1-2 alcoholic drinkers per day, compared to nondrinkers.

o   Bone mineral density was between 4.5-7% greater in men consuming 1-2 beers per day than non-beer drinkers.

o   Bone mineral density was between 3-8.9% lower in men consuming greater than 2 liquor drinks per day, compared to nondrinkers.

·         For postmenopausal women:  linear trends were more pronounced than with men.

o   Bone mineral density was between 5-7.4% greater in postmenopausal women consuming greater than 2 alcoholic drinks per day, compared to nondrinkers.

o   Bone mineral density was between 8.3-10.7% greater in postmenopausal women consuming greater than 2 glasses of wine per day, than nondrinkers.

o   Bone mineral density was between 7.9% greater (in the spine only) for those postmenopausal women consuming greater than 2 liquor drinks per day, compared to nondrinkers.

What does this all mean?

The results shown in this study indicate that there seems to be protective effects of alcohol, particularly wine and beer, on bone mineral density in adults.  There also appears to be a difference in response between different types of alcoholic beverages, and between the sexes.  For men, it appears that moderate consumption of beer is beneficial for bone mineral density, however heavier consumption of alcohol tends to have more negative effects on bone mineral density for men (wine not analyzed). 

For postmenopausal women, the effect is much different, in that not only is moderate alcohol consumption good for bone mineral density, but it also appears that larger quantities of alcohol consumption are also beneficial in regards to bone mineral density.  In postmenopausal women, it appears that wine gives the strongest benefit of increased bone mineral density.

Why there is this difference is response between premenopausal and postmenopausal women is not clear, though the authors of this study speculate that there could be possible effects of alcohol (specifically, the ethanol component) on adrenal androgens or estrogen concentrations.  The effect may be seen more in postmenopausal women and men than in premenopausal women since the estrogens levels, which are typically lower in postmenopausal women and men, are increased by the presence of alcohol.  The authors also speculated that it is the actual mechanism of increased bone mineral density with alcohol consumption may be an acute suppression of bone resorption, which is the primary cause of bone mineral loss (which has been shown in other studies).

With wine, resveratrol, which is a major constituent of wine and has been shown to have protective cardiovascular effects, may also play a role in this observed increase in bone mineral density in older adults.  In the rat model, studies have shown that rats treated with resveratrol had significantly greater bone mineral densities than those rats not treated.  So, it is possible that resveratrol, in addition to ethanol and other constituents of wine, may be playing an important role in this relationship between alcohol (specifically, wine) intake and increased bone mineral density.

Whatever the mechanism may be, be it through increase estrogen levels by ethanol intake or decrease bone resorption, it seems to be the cause that moderate alcohol intake (in particular wine for postmenopausal women) has a positive effect on decreasing bone mineral loss, and thereby potentially decreasing the risk of osteoporosis.  One must be careful, however, as even though it was shown that postmenopausal women consuming large amounts of alcohol per day had increased bone mineral density, one also has to remember the negative effects of high alcohol intake on other bodily systems. 

The authors indicate a few limitations of the study, which could potentially have negative effects on the results shown (though I think it’s likely that the results would not change very significantly), and I believe it’s important to list those for you now, so that you may judge for yourself whether you think the results are reliable:

  1.       Long-term alcohol effects were not taken into consideration, and could be confounding factors in the study.
  2.       Even though bone mineral density was adjusted for the confound factors I listed in the methods section, there could be other factors not included that could also be confounding.
  3.       A steady drinking pattern may be more beneficial than binge drinking, though because of the nature of the questionnaires, and the fact that alcohol consumption was measured as an average and not a daily usage, some misclassification of alcohol consumption patterns could have been made.
  4.       Since the number of women consuming beer was so low, no conclusions could be drawn from it, thereby we won’t know how beneficial (or not) beer is compared to other alcoholic beverages.

More work needs to be done to help tease out some of the details, however, I think it is clear from this study that moderate consumption of alcohol, particular wine, has positive health benefits related to increase bone mineral density, and thereby potentially decreased risk of osteoporosis in older adults.  Though heavy alcohol consumption was also shown to have positive effects on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women, it should be noted that heavy alcohol consumption would have more negative effects in other parts of the body, thus would ultimately be detrimental over all.

For kids, the saying goes: “Milk does a body good”, whereas for older adults (when consumed moderately), I think it’s safe to say that “Wine does a body good”!

http://yourclubconnection.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/For-Strong-Bones-Drink-Red-Wine.jpg

For questions/comments/requests for clarifications, please feel free to comment below!  I’d love to hear from you!

Full citation for the article under review:

 Tucker, K.L., Jugdaohsignh, R., Powell, J.J., Qiao, N., Hannan, M.T., Sripanyakorn, S., Cupples, L.A., and Kiel, D.P. 2009. Effects of beer, wine and liquor intakes on bone mineral density in older men and women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 89: 1188-1196.
I am not a health professional, nor do I pretend to be. Please consult your doctor before altering your alcohol consumption habits. Do not consume alcohol if you are under the age of 21. Do not drink and drive. Enjoy responsibly!

China: The Next Leader in the Wine Industry?

A French Bordeaux…an Oregon Pinot…an Argentinean Malbec…a Chinese Merlot?

When you think of top wine producing and consuming nations, you think of France, Italy, the United States, etc.  European history is steeped in wine, as is the United States, South America, and Africa in more recent history.  However, due to its incredible economic boom within the past few decades, China is now looking to be the next “big boy” in the wine business, and could potentially dominate the industry as it has for so many other industries.

This week wraps up with an article looking at business and marketing strategies of the new economic giant, China, and how it has come to be at the forefront of wine production and exporting, with predictions on how the world of wine as we know it will or will not change.

http://www.wineoftheweek.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/china_wine.jpg

 

As a result of China’s booming economy, the demand for wine has increased, thus giving wine producers in other countries access to a new market that was not there before, and they are exporting more than ever.  With a population of over 1.3 billion people (in 2009), and a 4th in the world GDP ranking (in 2009), wine sales in China have increase significantly.  Not only have sales of imported wine gone up significantly, but wine and grape production in China has also significantly increased.  Therefore, the question arises:  will China rely mostly on imported wines from other countries to satisfy their consumer needs; or, will domestic production increase to a point where there is no demand for foreign wines, and they export more to dominate the world wine market?

Grape and Wine Production

Grapes are not a new agricultural crop in China.  They’ve been growing in the region for thousands of years, though wine production was next to nothing prior to the formation of the People’s Republic of China.  Once China’s economy took hold and started to grow rapidly, grape production also began to increase (though it is still behind the consumer demand for wine).  Several varieties of grapes are currently grown in China.  For whites, Chardonnay, Italian Riesling, Ugni blanc, Chenin blanc, Gewurztraminer, Sauvignon blanc, Semillon, white Riesling, and Rkatsiteli are grown.  For reds, Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet franc, Merlot, French blue, Muscat, Hamburg, Pinot Noir, Syrah, Carignan, and Saperavi are grown.  Unlike a lot of other places in the world, China does not seem to have any phylloxera pest issues, which makes growing grapes successfully and to full ripeness much easier than in other places in the world.

In 2005, Chinese vineyards produced 487 million liters of wine from 1,150 thousand acres of grape vines, which exceeded the production of Australia, Chile, and South Africa combined!  Total vineyard acreage in China has grown over 113% between 2004-2009, which makes it the fastest grape growing country in the world.  In China, grapes are now the 5th most produced fruit in the country.  Even though this growth is impressive, per capita production of wine is still relatively low.  Therefore, China still relies heavily on imports, though if growth continues the way it has, that all may very well change.  Even so, China is the world’s fastest growing wine producer, backed by government campaigns urging the Chinese consumers to switch from rice wines to grape wines, in order to preserve the nation’s supply of rice for food production.

How much wine do the Chinese drink compared to the rest of the world?

As a result of the rapidly growing economy in China, more and more Chinese citizens are choosing to drink wine on a regular basis.  Wine consumption in China has been increasing by about 10% or more per year during this economic boom.  Chinese people are used to drinking spirits distilled from sorghum and maize (corn), but consuming a variety of alcoholic beverages (including wine) is the new trend for the Chinese culture.  By 2006, China made up about 6% of the total world wine market (in consumption), compared to 11% by the United States.  That statistic shows how quickly China is catching up to the Western world regarding the consumption of wine. 

http://www.prlog.org/10233742-chinese-tourists-enjoy-french-wine-in-bordeaux-france.jpg

 

One place where China is currently lagging is in per capita consumption.  This is likely due to the fact that there are significantly more people in China to divide all of the wine between, however, the fact of the matter is this value is still at a low point, though is likely to increase dramatically in the coming years.  For example, in 2009, per capita consumption of wine in China was a mere 1.12 liters, compared to 54 liters per capital in France, and 49 liters per capita in Italy.  This leaves a lot of room for increasing consumption, but based on the current growth patterns in China, it is likely to occur.

To Import, Export, or Produce One’s Own…

At this point in time, the demand for wine in China is far greater than the supply of Chinese wine in the domestic market.  The question remains: will foreign exports dominate the wine supply in China? Or will the domestic market grow to satiate that need, and potentially export to become a dominate player in the world wine industry?  It’s all well and good for foreign importers at the moment.  They are making a lot of money off of Chinese citizens demanding their wines.  What’s going to happen when the grape and wine production of China grows enough to alleviate the need for foreign imports?

http://www.psfk.com/wp-content/uploads/HLIC/39a280f128a5a563e42f2d07379638c8.png

Some advantages China has over the rest of the world in regards to wine production (and most other products, for that matter) are their low-cost skilled employees, huge agricultural land holdings, and huge financial reserves, which make for an overall low cost of production, and ultimately low sticker price on the store shelves.  China has equipped themselves with the best technology available, and have the marketing and business skills necessary to become a world leader in wine production. 

For example the Longhai International Trading Company, Ltd, a Chinese real estate group, in 2009 acquired Château Latour Languens, which is a vineyard/winery in Bordeaux, France that produces upwards of 160,000 bottles per year from 30 hectares of vines.  The main reason for this purchase was to master the techniques of wine making in France, and to become a legitimate wine trader. 

As China becomes more serious about the wine industry and moves further away from “half-juice” wines, companies such as ChangYu are moving up in price point, focusing more on mid- to high-end wines.  In 2001, the company joined with Castel, a well-known French wine group, to further prove how serious they are about the world wine industry.  In 2006, the company joined forces with the Canadian Aurora Ice Wine Company, which were successful in planting 300 hectares of ice grape vines in China.  The ChangYu company also created a chateau in New Zealand (ChangYu Kely Estate of New Zealand), collaborating with the Karikari Estate of New Zealand to build a wine distribution network at 100 golf courses throughout China.  The wines produced by this company currently target foreigners, which therefore already shows how powerful a competitor China is and will become in the world wine market.

In 2007, ChangYu was ranked 10th in the world wine industry with sales revenue of $695 million USD.  This marked the first time in history that an Asia winery was listed as a Top 10 winery in the world.  Not only does China have some award-winning wines, but also have the cheap labor and low production costs to inundate the world with Chinese wines.  In May of this year, their 2009 Bordeaux-style blend (named Jia Beilan) made by the winery, Helan Qingxue, took home the top prize for the Middle East/Far East/Asia category for red wines over 10 pounds.  Though this competition wasn’t exactly The Judgment of Paris, shows how Chinese wines are starting to become higher in quality compared to wines throughout the rest of the world.

Will everything be “Made in China?”

http://trendsupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/made-in-china-export-tag.jpg

 

So what happens when you have mid- to high-quality wines at the low low prices that China can produce?  Will it cost so much less for stores to carry them that they feature primarily Chinese made wines?  Will Bordeaux and Burgundy be a thing of the past?  I predict that China will become a major player in the world wine industry, much like the Yellow Tails and Penguins of Australia have become, however, with quality consistently high and the history rich, I don’t see French, Italian, American, or other European wine producers going out of business any time soon. 

What do you all think?  Please leave your comments below.  I’d love to hear what you have to say!

The full citation for the article used for reference during this discussion:

Mitry, D.J., Smith, D.E., and Jenster, P.V. 2009. China’s role in global competition in the wine industry: A new contestant and future trends. International Journal of Wine Research 1: 19-25.
I am not a health professional, nor do I pretend to be. Please consult your doctor before altering your alcohol consumption habits. Do not consume alcohol if you are under the age of 21. Do not drink and drive. Enjoy responsibly!