Tag Archives: millennials

Book Review: Rock and Vine: Next Generation Changemakers in America’s Wine Country

 

—————————————————————————————————-

Welcome to The Academic Wino!  If you are new here, please read the “About Me” page to find out more about myself and the blog. If you would like to receive free updates on articles like this by email, then sign up here or you can subscribe to the RSS feed. Also, check us out on TwitterFacebookGoogle+, and or Pinterest. Thanks for visiting!

—————————————————————————————————-

It is well known throughout the wine world the names of the Godfathers of American wine and those that helped establish, grow, and immortalize American wine throughout history.  Well, what about now?  To whom have our wine forefathers/mothers passed the proverbial torch to keep the American wine industry evolving and succeeding in the global wine world?

Rock and Vine: Next Generation Changemakers in America’s Wine Country by Chelsea Prince (and photography by Mary Steinbacher) set to release on February 12th, 2013, takes the reader on a written and visual journey through the lives and stories of several of the up and coming influencers in the American

Source: https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRNNicT0bHrtAEXA_KkzES33ZINcqPhW6hOXcpyfIQMRjTpAMNp

Source: https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRNNicT0bHrtAEXA_KkzES33ZINcqPhW6hOXcpyfIQMRjTpAMNp

wine industry today.  Arranged as a coffee table-style book, Rock and Vine beautifully illustrates how the new generation of wine “changemakers” came into their craft and how they are or plan to influence the American and global wine markets.

One certainly does not need to read this book from cover to cover.  As any coffee table books are designed, one can just flip to any random page and learn about the particular wine personality one happens to land on.  The individual stories are well written and flows smoothly from one paragraph to the next.  Beautiful color photographs are on nearly every page and almost tell the story without the words themselves.

The one qualm I have with the book is minor and picky in nature.  The title suggests that the individuals showcased in the book are those in the “American wine country”, however, in reality, those showcased are only in the Napa and Sonoma wine countries.  I believe those showcased are, in fact, some of the best young wine influencers in the Napa and Sonoma regions, however, to consider the book about the future of American wine country, I think they should have included up and comers in other parts of the country (i.e. Oregon, Washington, New York, Virginia, etc).   Perhaps the title should have read “Next Generation Changemakers in California’s Wine Country”.  Note: I’m not really upset about it, just pointing out the incredibly minor issue.

Overall, this is a wonderful coffee table book highlighting some of the up and comers in the California and American wine industry.  If you love wine and you love photography, this is certainly a book you’ll want to pick up!

To purchase Rock and Vine: Next Generation Changemakers in America’s Wine Country, please click on this link.

TO PURCHASE ON AMAZON.COM, CLICK HERE!

Women Prefer Wine and Liquor While Men Prefer Beer: Using an Implicit Measures Approach to Determine Consumer Behavior

Often when we see a study examining alcohol preferences and habits in people, we cannot be certain if the results are based on what the participants want to report due to potential guilt or embarrassment, or if the results are actually based on fact.  Survey-type research often runs the risk of experiencing this type of variation, which may not actually reflect what the individual or group of individuals prefers or how they behave in real world situations.

One way to work around the survey method in order to obtain a potentially more accurate presentation of consumer preference and behavior is using what is called “implicit measures”.   What this means is that the strength of an

Photo by jenni from the block: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8434/7827785878_34859830a8.jpg

association (i.e. how strongly one associates or attaches oneself to a particular stimuli such as a specific type of alcohol) is inferred by the behavior of an individual as opposed to simply asking the individual how they feel about that particular stimuli.  Using implicit measures allows for capturing information that is beyond the conscious control of the individual, theoretically giving a more accurate representation of their preferences and consumption behaviors.

The short communication (i.e. quick study) presented today aimed to evaluate using implicit measures to determine how gender and drinker status (i.e. how much and how often one drinks) relates to selection stimuli (in this case, type of alcohol).  The implicit measures test used in this study is the Implicit Association Test (IAT).  This test uses picture or words to represent a single type of alcohol or picture or words to represent different types of alcohol.  According to the authors, this type of methodology could provide more accurate answers and ensure that the choice made actually reflects the true behavior of the consumer compared to survey methods or other methods that may be inaccurate and inconsistent.

Note: this study is a test of methods.

Methods

300 undergraduates (136 male, 164 female) between the ages of 18 and 25 (mean = 20.47) participated in this study.  They were recruited by email, and were told that they would be participating in a research study about cognitive processes and alcohol.

  • 57% identified themselves as white/Caucasian;
  • 30% Asian;
  • 9% multiracial;
  • 4% as black/African American, American Indian/Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian/other Pacific Islander, unknown, or declined answer.

During the IAT test, classification of preference should be faster when the

Photo by batrax: http://farm1.staticflickr.com/24/92549990_37387f7ca0.jpg

pairing of the target and attribute categories match the individual’s personal associations in their memories.  Two separate IAT tests were used:  alcohol approach (approach or avoid) and alcohol excitement (excite or depress).  A higher IAT score indicates a stronger relationship between alcohol and approach than alcohol and avoid, and between alcohol and excite than alcohol and depress.  In other words, a higher score indicates the individual would consume the alcohol and not avoid drinking it, and that the individual is excited about drinking a particular type of alcohol and not indifferent or “depressed” about drinking another type.

During the test, participants selected four images of alcoholic beverages out of 15.  Each image contained 3 different examples of the alcohol they were representing (i.e. 3 different types of beer or 3 different types of wine, etc).  They were asked to choose the images that corresponded to the type of alcohol they drink most often, and if they were classified as “non-drinkers”, they would select the image that corresponded to the type of alcohol that was offered to them most often.

Quantity of consumption at one time and frequency over the past 30 days were also measured.

Results

  • Women chose more wine and liquor than men.
  • Men chose more beer than women.
  • Those considered heavy episodic drinkers (i.e. binge drinkers) chose more beer than those that were not binge drinkers.
  • Binge drinkers chose less wine than those that were not binge drinkers.
  • Binge drinkers chose more liquor than those that were not binge drinkers.
  • Female non-drinkers were more likely to choose iced malt beverages than female binge drinkers.
  • Those who consumed higher amounts of alcohol had higher IAT scores than other consumers
    • In other words, they associated more closely with “alcohol and approach” than “alcohol and avoid” and more closely with “alcohol and excite” than “alcohol and depress”.
    • Non-drinkers had significantly lower IAT scores than binge drinkers and those consuming alcohol more moderately.

Conclusions

In general, the results of this study are consistent with other studies examining the drinking habits of college students.  Males preferred more beer than females, and females preferred more wine and/or liquor than males.  In regards to the preference of those who consumed a heavy amount of alcohol at one time, those participants preferred more beer and liquor, and not wine.  Finally, females that do not drink alcohol and those that do not drink heavily at one time preferred iced malt beverages more than the other participants.

Results from the IAT test suggest that alcohol associations (i.e. “approach or

Photo by Rennette Stowe: http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8308/7847608288_5b02fcc912.jpg

avoid” or “excite or depress”) are sensitive to differences in the amount of alcohol consumed and not to the particular type of beverage selected.  In other words, IAT test scores were significantly higher for those that consumed heavily during a drinking episode than for those that do not consume heavily at one time or that don’t drink at all.

The authors suggest that due to these results, research examining alcohol preferences among individuals or groups should use the Implicit Association Test, which would help decrease variability associated with survey-type methods that can be complicated by lying or stretching of the truth due to guilt or embarrassment.

One problem with this study is that it only includes undergraduate students; therefore the results may or may not reflect what the entire population as a whole represents.  The study also did not include other types of alcohol such as alcoholic energy drinks, even though these types of beverages are popular among college-aged students.

Ultimately, the authors claimed that the results of this study indicate that implicit measures may be a more appropriate and more accurate methodology for measure actual preferences of alcohol consumers than traditional survey methods.

I would like to have seen this study coupled with a survey method, to compare the results from the survey directly to the results of the implicit measures test.  The authors say that the implicit measures method would provide more accurate results in regards to actual alcohol consumption behavior, however, they do not describe or compare what the participants responses would have been if they were just answering the questions directly on a survey.  If they did do this, it wasn’t made clear in the paper.

What do you all think about using implicit measures methods for determining consumer behavior?  Have you ever filled out a survey asking for alcohol consumption habits?  Did you stretch the truth a little, or were you completely honest?  Please feel free to leave your comments!

Source: Lindgren, K.P., Westgate, E.C., Kilmer, J.R., Kaysen, D., and Teachman, B.A. 2012. Pick your poison: Stimuli selection in alcohol-related implicit measures. Addictive Behaviors 37: 990-993.

 

Millennial Generation Preferences for Wine: Further Evidence for Developing Effective Marketing Strategies

In the United States, Baby Boomers are still currently the generation that consumes the most wine.  However, the younger generation (a.k.a. “Millennials”, “Generation Y”, “Echo Boomers”, or “Nexters”) is continually learning about wine and may one day surpass their parental generation in terms of wine consumption.  Studies have found that there are significant differences in regards to wine consumption habits between the different age groups; therefore it’s important for wine marketers to get a better understanding of the behaviors for each in order to successfully advertise their wines to each group.  Even though there are differences between age groups, it is important to note that these differences are not universal across the globe, and similar age groups in different countries will display different wine behavior and consumption patterns.

http://drinknectar.com/wp-content/
uploads/2011/03/Millennial-Wine.jpg

To date, most of the studies looking at differences between generations and wine consumption have focused on behaviors and attitudes toward wine; with very few examining the preferences and factors that encourage Millennials to chose wine as their preferred beverage.  A study that explores differences in wine preferences between generations (specifically, between the Millennials and their parent generation, the Baby Boomers) should provide very useful information to marketers in the wine industry and give them a better understanding of how to reach this younger generation.

The population of Millennials in the United States is roughly 76 million.  Though there isn’t an exact date for classification into this age group, it is understood that those born after 1978 are part of this generation.  Millennials tend to be very well educated, self-reliant, and very well connected to technology and the internet (almost 90% are connected to the web).  As a result of this strong connection to media and technology, Millennials are more likely influenced by information they find while connected.

Millennials are also very important in terms of their purchasing power.  They have their own money, and studies have also shown that they play an important role in their family’s decision making.  In regards to brands, it has been shown that Millennials look for brands that provide quality at a fair price.  They also prefer that advertisers tell the truth in their ads, and are less swayed by celebrities endorsing a product.  Finally, Millennials are more environmentally aware than their older counterparts, and are more environmentally and socially responsible.

What about consumption patterns?

Studies have found that Millennials are more likely to drink wine in bars and restaurants, compared to the older generations who prefer to drink wine at home.  Similarly, Millennials prefer drinking wine in social contexts and for relaxation, for example with friends and family in a bar or with a meal.  Even though Millennials are self-reliant, they are also easily influenced by other people, so if their friends and family are drinking wine, they are more likely to also drink wine.  As a result of this ease of influence, those in the Millennial generation consider recommendations made by retail clerks more important than their counterparts in older generations do.

In the US, Millennials tend to prefer domestic wines to imported wines, though they do show more interest in imported wines than their older counterparts.  Studies have also shown that the Millennial generation is the first to start off drinking red wines instead of the usual white or sweeter wines that individually typically start off consuming.  According to one study in particular, the Millennial generation prefers mostly red wines, and are also the highest consumers of sparkling wine in the US.

In terms of advertisements, Millennials are more influenced by ads focusing on social interactions rather than specific attributes about the product.  Millennials are also more highly receptive to alternatives to the norm, including screw cap closures, more portable packaging such as boxes and bags, as well as smaller sized portions.  In terms of labeling, Millennials prefer more creative labels.  Finally, Millennials prefer wine advertisements to be different from advertisements for beer or liquor.

The goal of the study presented today was to measure the importance given to US consumers to different attributes of wine when choosing to purchase a wine in an off-premise setting, and to compare the results between Millennials and their older generation counterparts.  The results of this study could be important with assisting the wine industry in better reaching the Millennial generation and meeting their needs by developing better marketing strategies. 

Methods

For this study, a web-based survey was conducted in April 2010.  The survey was split into three sections: 1) questions included those referring to the participants’ wine consumption behavior (to screen out those who never purchased wine in an off-premise setting); 2) participants rated the importance of 13 attributes of wine; and 3) questions regarding sociodemographics of participants.

The 13 attributes chosen for the survey were:

  •       Tasted the wine previously
  •       Someone recommended it
  •       Grape variety
  •       I read about it
  •        Brand name
  •        Origin of the wine
  •       Matches my food
  •        Information on the shelf
  •        An attractive front label
  •        Information on the back label
  •       Promotional display in the store
  •       Medal or award
  •       Alcohol level below 13%

The importance of each attribute was rated using the Best-Worst Scaling method.  This method works by asking the participant to indicate the most (best) and least (worst) important attribute from a sub-set of all attributes.  In this study, the “most” and “least” important attributes were related to how they influenced a participants’ choice of wine when purchasing in an off-premise location.

Results

  •       Out of the 260 US consumers participating in this study, 58.8% were women, 84.2% had a higher education, 55.4% were married, and 56.2% had an income over $50,000.
  •       Participants below the age of 32 were considered Millennials, and participants over the age of 32 were considered part of older generations.

o   45% of participants were Millennials, 55% were part of older generations.

  •         The Millennial generation was predominantly women, mostly unmarried, had higher education, and made less than their older generation counterparts.
  •       45% of participants bought wine less than once per month; 26.5% bought wine between 2 and 3 times per month; and 28.5% bought wine more than once per week.

o   There were no significant differences found between Millennials and the older generations in regard to monthly purchasing frequency.

  •         33% bought more than 7 bottles, 23.1% bought between 4 and 7 bottles, and 43.5% bought less than four bottles of wine during the last four weeks.

o   The Millennials bought significantly fewer bottles of wine than older generations.

  •       35.7% of purchases were in liquor stores, 21.8% were in grocery stores, 18.3% were in wine shops, 10.5% were in restaurants, and 9.8% were in wineries.

o   The Millennials bought significantly more often from grocery stores, while the older generations bought more from liquor stores and wineries.

Wine Attributes

  •       The most important attribute for the Millennials was “tasted the wine previously”, and the least important attribute was “alcohol level below 13%”. 

o   The same was true for the older generations.

  •        “Someone recommended it” was significantly more important for Millennials than older generations.
  •       “An attractive front label” was significantly more important for Millennials than older generations.
  •        “I read about it” was significantly more important for older generations than for Millennials.
  •         “Grape variety” was significantly more important for older generations than for Millennials.
  •        “Promotional display in store” was significantly more important for Millennials than older generations.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that there are significant differences in preferences for wine between the Millennial generation and the older generations in the United States, which is confirmed by similar results of other studies.  Though purchase frequency was similar for all generations examined, purchase volume was significantly different, with Millennials purchasing lower volumes of wine than their older counterparts.  Also, Millennials preferred purchasing their wines in grocery stores, whereas their older counterparts preferred purchasing from liquor stores or wineries.

According to the authors, the differences noted in this study suggest that the Millennial generations’ preference for wine is influenced more by marketing techniques such as in-store displays/promotions and labeling, whereas the older generations are more influenced by information about the wine, since they are more knowledgeable in general about wine and understand more details that Millennials may not.  As a result of the Millennial generations’ limited experience in wine, they are still developing a taste for it and are more easily influenced by certain marketing strategies that target their interests.

Since Millennials are a generation who in the near future will be of high value to the US wine industry, gaining a deeper understanding of their wine preferences and the factors that drive their preferences is crucial for the wine industry and wine marketers to alter their advertising strategies to better target this large group of buyers.  Studies, including this one, have shown that in store promotion and labeling is most influential on the wine purchasing behavior of Millennials, therefore it is in the wine industry’s best interest to focus on these areas for advertising.  Since Millennials wine preferences are still evolving, and they have been shown to be more open to new experiences and new types of wine, marketers should think about focusing their new product advertising directly on Millennials instead of older generations, who are already “set in their ways” in regards to wine preferences.

Since the sample sizes were relatively small, it’s tough to say if the results of this study are representative of the entire US Millennial population.  Future studies should be performed using a larger number of participants from all corners of the country.  Also, it would be interesting administer these questionnaires to Millennials all over the world, in order to get an idea of who Millennials’ wine purchasing behavior changes (or remains the same) in different cultures.

What do you all think of this study and its results?  Please feel free to comment below (no html tags, please).

Source: Chrysochou, P., Krystallis, A., Mocanu, A., and Lewis, R.L. 2012. Generation Y preferences for wine: An exploratory study of the US market applying best-worst scaling. British Food Journal 114(4): 516-528.

DOI: 10.1108/00070701211219531
I am not a health professional, nor do I pretend to be. Please consult your doctor before altering your alcohol consumption habits. Do not consume alcohol if you are under the age of 21. Do not drink and drive. Enjoy responsibly!

Millennials: Are Their Wine Preferences Globally Generalizable?

Millennials, otherwise known as Generation Y, currently are the largest consumer group in United States history.  It is within the United States that market research first found that Millennials, as they reach legal drinking age, have become increasingly interested in drinking wine.  In regards to wine consumption practices among Millennials, some studies have shown that they are generally willing to spend more for wine (though some studies have shown the exact opposite), and that consumption patterns are generally different than other generations previous.  Also, as I’ve discussed in a previously written post on this blog, even something as detailed as bottle label preferences is different for Millennials than older wine consumers.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/35884557@N00/3723292620/

 

Studies have also shown that Millennial behavior varies from country to country, and that generalizing all individual behavior within the Millennial generation is misguided.  For example, while wine consumption among Millennials is rising in the United States, studies have shown that consumption is declining in their Italian, Spanish, and French counterparts.  Some studies have suggested that even within a particular culture, it is extremely difficult to generalize across all Millennials, as even within a particular culture, wine consumption preferences are variable.

Based on several theories relating to generational behavior and experience, it has been suggested that different generations should differ in their social values, as their experiences early on in life shape their choices for the remainder of their lives.  When comparing wine consumption patterns of the younger generation to the older generation, studies have shown that younger wine consumers see wine as more of a social occasion beverage, of which they are more likely to consume in bars or restaurants instead of at home as the older generations prefer.  Younger wine consumers are also not partial to only wine, and consume a variety of alcoholic beverages, whereas older consumers tend to stick with wine primarily. 

There is currently a lot of conflicting evidence when it comes to determining wine consumption patterns and preferences of Millennials.  For example, when it comes to the choice between domestic and imported wines, some studies have shown that Americans prefer to consume imports, while other studies found just the opposite, indicating a Millennial preference for domestic wines.  Generalizations of Millennials across countries also seems to be problematic, as even though studies have shown that in general, Millennials prefer red wines over white, the Millennial population of Australia significantly prefers white wines over red.

The current study presented today seeks to examine this question of whether or not wine consumption patterns of Millennials can be generalized across or within different cultures throughout the globe.  First, the paper sought to determine the degree to which Millennial wine consumers differ from older generations, in regards to wine consumption preferences and purchase patterns, and how generalizable these patterns are across cultures and markets.  Second, the paper sought to determine the effect of generation on the variance of the consumer behavior.  According to the authors, this second analysis will determine if generalizing wine preferences across generations is useful in wine marketing strategies.

Methods

Five countries were evaluated in this study, while also covering both a traditional and a more recently established wine market in Europe and North America.  The two traditional European markets studied were France and Germany, while the more recently established wine market in Europe studied was the UK (historically a beer-drinking region).  For North America, the United States (the world’s largest import market) and Canada were studied. 

Within the United States, the Northeast (New York metropolitan area) and the Midwest (Chicago metropolitan area) were compared, with the Northeast representing a more traditional market, the Midwest representing a newer market (which is most similar to the rest of the country).  Canada, a traditional wine market, was split into two different cultural regions, the English-speaking part of the country, and the French-speaking part of the country.  All of these areas represent different geographical and cultural regions throughout the globe, which can then be compared for difference among Millennial wine consumers.

Surveys were distributed to study participants, that were first written in English, then translated to the appropriate language.  These surveys were then back-translated, to be sure all interpretations were equal across cultures.  In order to qualify for the study, participants were required to have consumed wine at least once in the last two months, were of legal drinking age, and have purchased a bottle of wine within the last three months.  The study subjects were already wine consumers, and therefore the results are not representative of those Millennials who have never consumed any wine whatsoever.

Results

  •       Personal Values: Conservatism   

o   There was a small generational effect on conservatism, and was nearly universal across all markets.

o   Older generations tended to give higher conservatism values than younger generations.

o   Conservatism was most important in Germany, and least important in English-speaking Canada.

  •       Personal Values: Openness to Change

o   There were small to medium effects across markets, and very small effects across generations.

o   There were significant difference between North America (most open to change) and Europe (least open to change).

o   On average, younger generations were more open to change than older generations.

  •       Personal Values: Self-Enhancement

o   There was a strong effect of self-enhancement across generations.

o   Younger generations tended to be more success and status oriented than older generations.

  •       Personal Values: Environmental Concerns

o   There was a strong effect of environmental concerns across generations.

o   Younger generations tended to be more concerned about the environment than older generations, though the difference was not significant between the Millennial generation and Generation X.

o   There were market effects as well, with the older generations of Germans showing more concern for the environment than the younger generations.

  •       Alcoholic Beverage Preferences

o   Millennials were more likely to purchase wine in addition to other alcoholic beverages, such as beer or liquor, compared to older generations who primarily purchased only wine.

o   There were smaller differences between the generations in more traditional markets compared to more recently established markets (traditional markets less willing to change?).

o   Younger wine consumers were more open to alternative packaging of wine, including boxes and cans, and was seen more strongly in the US and English-speaking Canada than in France, Germany, and French-speaking Canada.

  •       Wine Involvement

o   There was a weak generational effect that is country-specific.

o   Generation X and the Millennial generation were more wine-involved in the US.

o   In the traditional markets of France and Germany, the younger generations tended to be the least wine-involved.

  •       Wine Innovativeness (desire to try new wines)

o   The older generations were least likely to try new wines.

o   In the Northeast USA, France, and the UK, Generation X showed the highest wine innovativeness.

o   In Germany and French-speaking Canada, the Baby Boomer generation showed the highest wine innovativeness.

  •       Wine Consumption Patterns

o   Older generations tended to drink more wine than younger generations, though there were several country-specific differences.

o   In the Northeast USA, Gen X and the Millennials drank significantly more wine than the older generations.

o   In France, Germany, and the UK, wine consumption frequency increased with age.

o   There were no differences in the Midwest USA or Canada.

  •       Price Per Bottle Paid

o   As a result of the different tax and food systems in each country, there were huge market effects in the average price paid per bottle among wine consumers.

  •       Domestic vs Imported

o   There were no significant generational effects of the choice between domestic or imported wines, though there were some trends.

o   The Great Generation tended to drink more imported than domestic wines overall.

o   In English-speaking Canada and Germany, older consumers tended to purchase more domestic wines, while the younger generations tended to purchase more imported wines.

  •       Red, White, or Rosé?

o   Nearly all markets showed that Millennials drink significantly more white and rosé wines than red wines.

§  Many of the wine preferences for Millennials may be attributed to the fact that they are relatively inexperienced with wine, thereby preferring the generally more approachable whites and rosés than reds.

o   France showed the highest preference for rosé wines, the UK showed a high preference for white wines, and French-speaking Canada showed the highest preference for red wines (all Millennials).

  •       Distribution Channels

o   Since not all countries have the same distribution system/channels for wine, the authors were not able to determine any market differences.

o   In the US, there were no differences in distribution channel choice among wine consumers.

o   Gen X and Millennials in France and Germany, as well as Baby Boomers in the UK tended to purchase their wines from grocery stores.

o   Millennials in Germany often used discount stores, while the Millennials in the UK tended to use small, independent food stores.

o   For the older generations in Canada, Gen X in France and Germany, and Millennials in the UK, purchasing wine in liquor or specialty stores was common.

o   English-speaking Canadian Millennials preferred purchasing directly from the winery, while older generations preferred this source in France and Germany.

o   English-speaking Canada was the only market where the authors found the internet as a primary source for purchasing wine for Millennials. 

o   Online wine ordering in the UK and France increased with age.

o   Online wine ordering in Germany was highest for Gen X and the Baby Boomers.

What does this all mean?

The authors of this paper presented a large amount of data, which provided some fascinating results and interpretations.  First and foremost, based on these results, it’s safe to say that wine preferences are NOT generalizable for Millennials across the globe, and must be focused more on the market level

It should also be noted that even though Millennial interest in wine is growing, the older generations still represent the core of many of the traditional wine markets around the globe, and thereby should not be discredited or ignored.  Both cohorts must be considered, and a balance must be obtained in order to help the Millennial population grow and learn more about the wine they are consuming, while at the same time not alienating the older generations that are less willing to change and try new types of wine. 

The results of this study showed that wine consumers tended to share wine preferences if they shared similar cultural backgrounds, and not necessarily geographical regions.  For example, there did not appear to be any differences in wine preferences (in general) between the Northeast and Midwest USA, whereas there were large differences between English- and French-speaking Canada.  The market most similar to French-speaking Canada was France, thereby indicating that it is culture and not necessarily geography that molds wine preferences for generations.

There will not be an easy “one-size-fits-all” approach to targeting specific generations, since as this research has shown, there is variability in regards to different markets.  Due to the variability within a generation of a given market, it is clear that the differences cannot be due simply to generational means.  One thing this study did not cover, which likely is playing a major role in the variability within generations, is sociodemographics.  Future research must look into this likely source of variability, in order to even further refine their targets.  Also, future research would need to examine other currently expanding wine markets, such as China and India.

In general, I thought this study provided excellent information regarding wine preferences of many different generations in different cultures.  I would be fascinated to see this study include the sociodemographic part of the picture, as well as the inclusion of even newer wine markets.  Being a Millennial myself, I can relate to the great variability in the study, as I myself found I did not fall into line with other Millennials when it came down to certain characteristics.  As the Millennial generation grows and matures in their wine tastes, the question of how to market to them will evolve.  I, for one, am excited to see how it develops over time!

I’d love to hear what you all think!  There is really a lot of discuss that I didn’t have time for in a single post.  Please feel free to start a discussion on what fascinated/bothered/interested/what-have-you the most in the comment section below!

Source:  Mueller, S., Remaud, H., and Chabin, Y. 2011. How strong and generalisable is the Generation Y effect? A cross-cultural study for wine. International Journal of Wine Business Research 23(2): 125-144.

DOI: 10.1108/17511061111142990
I am not a health professional, nor do I pretend to be. Please consult your doctor before altering your alcohol consumption habits. Do not consume alcohol if you are under the age of 21. Do not drink and drive. Enjoy responsibly!